tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2349173885651707639.post7788548908745043339..comments2023-10-29T13:30:37.281-04:00Comments on Communications & Society: The Problem of Intentionality, #cck12keith.hamonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08404376705918243534noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2349173885651707639.post-58814332867761951312012-02-27T17:58:20.405-05:002012-02-27T17:58:20.405-05:00Frances, thanks for the link to your post. What I ...Frances, thanks for the link to your post. What I liked most as I read it was your insistence on dialogue, which which forms the heart of Morin's view of complexity (his dialogic) and is in contrast to the dialectic, primarily as it does not seek a resolution either through an over-powering of one side by the other or through a mutual folding into a synthesis. Rather, the dialogic posits an keith.hamonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08404376705918243534noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2349173885651707639.post-76075905006836374482012-02-27T03:11:14.292-05:002012-02-27T03:11:14.292-05:00Not much time now Keith so just a quick comment. ...Not much time now Keith so just a quick comment. I agree with you that individual and network both need attention. A difference between connectivism and Actor Network Theory is that ANT is more interested in the formation and decay of networks than in networks as entities. However ANT has also been criticised for its limited treatment of power relations and I think the same is the case for Frances Bellhttp://www.francesbell.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.com